Clarify What is meant by Non-stock induction (SP)

Discussion related to classification of cars in the NEHA series.
steve108
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:17 pm
AntiSpam: No

Clarify What is meant by Non-stock induction (SP)

Post by steve108 »

When the classification worksheet refers to non-stock induction, does this mean a change from n/a to forced, or any change on the intake side of the engine?

Thanks
User avatar
Mopar 151
Posts: 470
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:03 am

Re: Clarify What is meant by Non-stock induction (SP)

Post by Mopar 151 »

I beleive this relates to any change, as we spell out a different change for (turbo)supercharging.
John and Michelle Reed
KSCC Life Member
NEHA # 151
steve108
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:17 pm
AntiSpam: No

Re: Clarify What is meant by Non-stock induction (SP)

Post by steve108 »

So does this mean that changing cams would cause no adjustments, while changing the carb would?
User avatar
3rdgendennis
Posts: 297
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 9:29 pm

Re: Clarify What is meant by Non-stock induction (SP)

Post by 3rdgendennis »

Without looking through the rules to give you an exact answer, I can see this being the case simply because changing a carb is clearly provable, while changing cams cannot be proven easily without taking things apart. As with any rules, some of our rules have to be on a sort of an honor system, because we don't have the resources to tear engines apart in tech.

As an answer to your original question, I believe this would encompass any aftermarket CAI, intake manifold, etc, as well as a turbo/supercharger like John said.
The youngest David Dennis
"If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space"
Dennis Motorsports
User avatar
Rabbit Farmer
Posts: 2260
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2003 11:37 pm
AntiSpam: No
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Clarify What is meant by Non-stock induction (SP)

Post by Rabbit Farmer »

3rdgendennis wrote:we don't have the resources to tear engines apart in tech.
We actually do... we just don't have the resources to put them back together.
Go Fast VW & Audi parts at FastAddiction.com
steve108
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:17 pm
AntiSpam: No

Re: Clarify What is meant by Non-stock induction (SP)

Post by steve108 »

Thanks for the answers. I have a car that is built for another type of auto x and I am trying to class it for hill climb. Depending on if cams are considered induction would move it from SP6 to SP5. I am an honest person so I just am looking for a yes or no does changing the cam invoke the non stock induction adjustment in SP, whether someone can prove it or not?

Thanks

Steve
User avatar
Rabbit Farmer
Posts: 2260
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2003 11:37 pm
AntiSpam: No
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Clarify What is meant by Non-stock induction (SP)

Post by Rabbit Farmer »

Only honest people race at our events. ;)
Go Fast VW & Audi parts at FastAddiction.com
User avatar
KevinGale
Posts: 836
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 3:01 pm
Location: Sutton, NH

Re: Clarify What is meant by Non-stock induction (SP)

Post by KevinGale »

Even it the rules don't require it you probably want to go with S5 since the spirt of the rule is the engine hasn't been altered.
User avatar
walterclark
Posts: 1442
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:57 pm
Location: Dover, MA.
Contact:

Re: Clarify What is meant by Non-stock induction (SP)

Post by walterclark »

steve108 wrote:Thanks for the answers. I have a car that is built for another type of auto x and I am trying to class it for hill climb. Depending on if cams are considered induction would move it from SP6 to SP5. I am an honest person so I just am looking for a yes or no does changing the cam invoke the non stock induction adjustment in SP, whether someone can prove it or not?

Thanks

Steve
My take is valves and cams dont constitute "non-stock induction". Manifolds, throttle bodies, etc. do.
The older I get the better I was.
User avatar
Number_5
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 2:48 pm
AntiSpam: No

Re: Clarify What is meant by Non-stock induction (SP)

Post by Number_5 »

I have to agree with Kevin. The "sprit of the rule" is easier to interpret. It does say, stock.
John Marsha
Vote !!
A man must learn to understand the motives of human beings, their illusions, and their sufferings.
Albert
Post Reply